УДК 631.4:544.623
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52540/2074-9457.2025.2.41
Скачать статью 

 

Г. Н. Бузук 

МЕТОД ИЗМЕНЯЮЩЕГОСЯ ГЕОМЕТРИЧЕСКОГО КОЭФФИЦИЕНТА ДЛЯ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ ЭЛЕКТРОПРОВОДНОСТИ/ЭЛЕКТРОСОПРОТИВЛЕНИЯ ПОЧВ

г. Витебск, Республика Беларусь

 

Представлен новый метод калибровки и обработки данных по электросопротивлению почв, полученных с использованием квадратной установки и неизолированных электродов. Метод основан на впервые выявленной линейной зависимости между глубиной погружения электродов в калибровочный раствор 0,001 М калия хлорида и геометрическим коэффициентом установки. Аппроксимация зависимости с помощью линейной регрессии позволяет оперативно рассчитывать актуальные значения геометрического коэффициента для различных субстратов, включая почву и водные экстракты. Разработано устройство для контролируемого заглубления электродов, обеспечивающее воспроизводимость измерений и снижение экспериментальных погрешностей. Предложенный подход открывает новые перспективы для стандартизации методики в почвенных и агрохимических исследованиях.

Такие измерения электросопротивления могут служить индикатором специфических условий местообитаний, способствующих формированию уникальных фитохимических профилей и адаптивных стратегий лекарственных растений.

Ключевые слова: электросопротивление почвы, геометрический коэффициент, квадратная установка, неизолированные электроды, линейная регрессия, калибровочный раствор 0,001 М калия хлорида, контролируемое заглубление, почвенный экстракт, методика измерений.

 

SUMMARY

N. Buzuk

METHOD OF VARIABLE GEOMETRY FACTOR IN SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY/RESISTIVITY DETERMINATION

A novel method for calibrating and processing soil electrical resistivity data has been developed using a square electrode configuration with non-insulated (bare) electrodes. The method is based on a newly identified linear relationship between electrode immersion depth in a 0.001 M potassium chloride (KCl) calibration solution and the geometric factor of the configuration. This dependence approximation using linear regression allows to calculate topical data of the geometric factor for various substrates including soils and aqueous extracts. A device for controlled electrode immersion providing measurements reproducibility and reduction of experimental errors has been designed. The proposed approach opens up new prospects for standardizing the methodology in soil and agrochemical research.

Such measurements of electrical resistivity can serve as an indicator of specific habitat conditions contributing to the formation of unique phytochemical profiles and adaptive strategies of medicinal plants.

Keywords: soil electrical resistivity, geometric factor, square electrode configuration, bare electrodes, linear regression, calibration solution, potassium chloride (KCl), controlled immersion, soil extract, measurement methodology.

 

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Поздняков, А. И. Электрофизика почв / А. И. Поздняков, А. Д. Позднякова. – Москва-Дмитров : Изд-во Московского гос. ун-та, 2004. – 48 с.

Поздняков, А. И. Электрофизические свойства некоторых почв / А. И. Поздняков, Ч. Г. Гюлалиев. – Москва-Баку : Адильоглы, 2004. – 240 с.

Поздняков, А. И. Полевая электрофизика в почвоведении, мелиорации и земледелии / А. И. Поздняков, Н. Г. Ковалёв, А. Д. Позднякова. – Тверь : ЧуДо, 2002. – 257 с.

Вадюнина, А. Ф. Методы исследования физических свойств почв / А. Ф. Вадюнина, З. А. Корчагина. – 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. – Москва : Агропромиздат, 1986. – 416 с.

Relationship between apparent electrical conductivity and soil physical properties in a Malaysian paddy field / A. Gholizadeh, M. S. M. Amin, A. R. Anuar, A. Wayayok // Archives of agronomy and soil science. – 2012. – Vol. 58, N 2. – P. 155–168. – DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2010.509132.

Corwin, D. L. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: Part II. Case study / D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch // Computers and electronics in agriculture. – 2005. – Vol. 46, N 1/3. – P. 135–152. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.003.

Lund, E. D. Practical applications of soil electrical conductivity mapping / E. D. Lund, C. D. Christy, P. E. Drummond // Precision agriculture / ed. J. V. Stafford. – Sheffield : Sheffield Academic Press, 1999. – P. 771–779.

Friedman, S. P. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review / S. P. Friedman // Computers and electronics in agriculture. – 2005. – Vol. 46, N 1/3. – P. 45–70. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001.

Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review / A. Samouëlian, I. Cousin, A. Tabbagh [et al.] // Soil and tillage research. – 2005. – Vol. 83, N 2. – P. 173–193. – DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004.

Reynolds, J. M. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics / J. M. Reynolds. – Chichester : John Wiley & Sons, 2011. – 696 p.

The geophysical toolbox applied to forest ecosystems–A review / B. Loiseau, S. D. Carrière, D. Jougnot [et al.] // Science of the total environment. – 2023. – Vol. 899. – P. 165503. – DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165503.

Handbook of agricultural geophysics / ed.: B. J. Allred, J. J. Daniels, M. R. Ehsani. – Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis Group, 2008. – 410 p.

Szalai, S. On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays / S. Szalai, L. Szarka // Geophysical prospecting. – 2008. – Vol. 56, N 2. – P. 159–175. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00673.x.

Seidel, K. Direct current resistivity methods / K. Seidel, G. Lange // Environmental geology: Handbook of field methods and case studies. – Berlin : Springer, 2007. – P. 205–237.

COMSOL Multiphysics : Reference Manual. – Burlington : COMSOL Inc., 2024. – URL: COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual 6.2 (date of access: 24.08.2025).

Lee, H. H. Finite element simulations with ANSYS workbench 2019 / H. H. Lee. – Tainan : SDC publications, 2019. – URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=QPqcDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&dq=Ansys+Meshing+User%27s+Guide&ots=5T3OjjZlyH&sig=dvo8yVIOHuDB_jKXOSSmn_HnNMg (date of access: 24.05.2025).

Adler, A. EIDORS: An open-source software for electrical impedance tomography / A. Adler, W. R. B. Lionheart // Physiological measurement. – 2006. – Vol. 27, N 5. – P. S25–S42. – DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S03.

Griffiths, D. H. Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology / D. H. Griffiths, R. D. Barker // Journal of applied geophysics. – 1993. – Vol. 29, N 3/4. – P. 211–226. – DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(93)90005-J.

Wenner, F. A method of measuring earth resistivity / F. Wenner // Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. – Washington : Government Printing Office, 1916. – Vol. 12. – P. 469–478.

A review on physico-chemical properties of soil / S. S. Kekane, R. P. Chavan, D. N. Shinde [et al.] // International journal of chemical studies. – 2015. – Vol. 3, N 4. – P. 29–32.

Corwin, D. L. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture / D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch // Computers and electronics in agriculture. – 2005. – Vol. 46, N 1/3. – P. 11–43. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005.

Challenges in mapping soil variability using apparent soil electrical conductivity under heterogeneous topographic conditions / I. M. Kulmány, L. Bede, D. Stencinger [et al.]  // Agronomy. – 2024. – Vol. 14, N 6. – P. 1–16. – DOI: 10.3390/agronomy14061161.

Corwin, D. L. Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture / D. L. Corwin, R. E. Plant // Computers and electronics in agriculture. – 2005. – Vol. 46, N 1/3. – P. 1–10. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.004.

McNeill, J. D. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers : Technical Note TN-6 / J. D. McNeill. – Mississauga : Geonics Limited, 1980. – 15 p.

Sheets, K. R. Noninvasive soil water content measurement using electromagnetic induction / K. R. Sheets, J. M. H. Hendrickx // Water resources research. – 1995. – Vol. 31, N 10. – P. 2401–2409. – DOI: 10.1029/95WR01949.

Topp, G. C. Measurement of soil water content using time-domain reflectrometry (TDR): a field evaluation / G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis // Soil Science Society of America Journal. – 1985. – Vol. 49, N 1. – P. 19–24. – DOI: 10.2136/SSSAJ1985.03615995004900010003X.

Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: New formulations and calibrations / J. D. Rhoades, N. A. Manteghi, P. J. Shouse, W. J. Alves // Soil Science Society of America journal. – 1989. – Vol. 53. – P. 433–439.

Corwin, D. L. Field-scale apparent soil electrical conductivity / D. L. Corwin, E. Scudiero // Soil Science Society of America journal. – 2020. – Vol. 84, N 5. – P. 1405–1441. – DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20153.

Corwin, D. L. An improved method for estimating soil salinity from soil electrical conductivity / D. L. Corwin, J. D. Rhoades // Soil Science Society of America Journal. – 1982. – Vol. 46, N 6. – P. 1217–1221.

Corwin, D. L. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines / D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch // Agronomy Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 95, N 3. – P. 455–471.

Ayars, J. E. Salinity management / J. E. Ayars, D. L. Corwin // Microirrigation for Crop Production / ed.: E. Ayars, D. Zaccaria, K. M. Bali. – 2nd ed. – [place unknown] : Elsevier Science, 2024. – P. 133–155.

Rhoades, J. D. Electrical conductivity methods for measuring and mapping soil salinity / J. D. Rhoades // Advances in Agronomy. – 1993. – Vol. 49. – P. 201–251. – DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60795-6.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообщение 1. Устройство и лабораторная методика / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2021. – № 3. – С. 32–40. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.3.32.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообще-ние 2. Конструкция электродов и способ расчета геометрического коэффициента / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2021. – № 4. –
С. 46–52. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.4.46.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообщение 3. Корректировка влияния влажности / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2021. – № 4. – С. 74–84. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.4.74.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообще-ние 4. Почвенная матрица / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2022. – № 1. – С. 56–62. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.1.56.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообще-ние 5. Полевые испытания / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2022. – № 2. – С. 65–76. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.2.65.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообще-ние 6. Квадратная установка, конструкция электродов и способ расчета геометрического коэффициента / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2022. – № 3. – С. 23–29. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.3.23.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообщение 7. Новое в технике измерений и расчетов / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2024. – № 2. – С. 31–41. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2024.2.31.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообщение 8. Полевые испытания с квадратной установкой / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2024. – № 4. – С. 44–54. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2024.4.44.

Бузук, Г. Н. Определение трофности почв электрофизическим методом. Сообщение 9. От линеаризации к экспоненциальной регрессии и корректировке влажности / Г. Н. Бузук // Вестник фармации. – 2025. – № 1. – С. 58–69. – DOI: 10.52540/2074-9457.2025.1.58.

Habberjam, G. M. The use of a square configuration in resistivity prospecting / G. M. Habberjam, G. E. Watkins // Geophysical prospecting. – 1967. – Vol. 15, N 3. – P. 445–467. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1967.tb01798.x.

Habberjam, G. M. The effects of anisotropy on square array resistivity measurements / G. M. Habberjam // Geophysical prospecting. – 1972. – Vol. 20, N 2. – P. 249–266. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00631.x.

Wu, Y. C. Proposed new electrolytic conductivity primary standards for KCl solutions / Y. C. Wu, W. F. Koch, K. W. Pratt // Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. – 1991. – Vol. 96, N 2. – P. 191–201. – DOI: 10.6028/jres.096.008.

Effects of equilibrium time on electrical conductivity measurements using soil-water extracts and soil saturated paste / B. S. Seo, K. S. Lee, Y. J. Leong, W. J. Choi // Korean journal of soil science and fertilizer. – 2021. – Vol. 54, N 2. – P. 257–263. – DOI: 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.2.257.

Aboukila, E. Assessment of saturated soil paste salinity from 1:2.5 and 1:5 soil-water extracts for coarse textured soils / E. Aboukila, E. F. Abdelaty // Alexandria Science Exchange journal. – 2017. – Vol. 38, N 4. – P. 722–732. – DOI: 10.21608/ASEJAIQJSAE.2017.4181.

Aboukila, E. F. Estimation of saturated soil paste salinity from soil-water extracts / E. F. Aboukila, J. B. Norton // Soil science. – 2017. – Vol. 182, N 3. – P. 107–113. – DOI: 10.1097/SS.0000000000000197.

Evaluation of 1:5 soil to water extract electrical conductivity methods / Y. He, T. DeSutter, L. Prunty [et al.] // Geoderma. – 2012. – Vol. 185. – P. 12–17. – DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.022.

Kargas, G. Comparison of soil EC values from methods based on 1:1 and 1:5 soils to water ratios and ECe from saturated paste extract-based method / G. Kargas, P. Londra, A. Sgoubopoulou // Water. – 2020. – Vol. 12, N 4. – P. 1–12. – DOI: 10.3390/w12041010.

Kargas, G. The effect of soil texture on the conversion factor of 1:5 soil/water extract electrical conductivity (EC 1:5) to soil saturated paste extract electrical conductivity (ECe) / G. Kargas, P. Londra, K. Sotirakoglou // Water. – 2022. – Vol. 14, N 4. – P. 1–10. – DOI: 10.3390/w14040642.

An Investigation of the relationship between the electrical conductivity of the soil saturated paste extract ECe with the respective values of the mass soil/water ratios 1:1 and 1:5 (EC1:1 and EC1:5) / G. Kargas, I. Chatzigiakoumis,
A. Kollias [et al.] // Proceedings (MDPI). – 2018. – Vol. 2, N 11. – P. 1–8. – DOI: 10.3390/proceedings2110661.

Evaluation and analysis of different regression models for estimation of ECe from EC1:5–With a case study from Buin-Zahra, Iran / M. Hassannia, B. Nazari, A. Kavani, A. Sotoodehnia // Irrigation and drainage. – 2020. – Vol. 69, N 5. – P. 1192–1203. – DOI: 10.1002/ird.2488.

Modeling the electrical conductivity relationship between saturated paste extract and 1:2.5 dilution in different soil textural classes / M. M. Omar, M. Shitindi, B. H. J. Massawe [et al.] // Frontiers in soil science. – 2024. – Vol. 4. – P. 1–10. – DOI: 10.3389/fsoil.2024.1421661.

Spiteri, K. Estimating the electrical conductivity of a saturated soil paste extract (ECe) from 1:1 (EC1:1), 1:2 (EC1:2) and 1:5 (EC1:5) soil: water suspension ratios, in calcareous soils from the Mediterranean Islands of Malta / K. Spiteri,
A. T. Sacco // Communications in soil science and plant analysis. – 2024. – Vol. 55, N 9. – P. 1302–1312. – DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2024.2304636.

Correlation between electrical conductivity in saturated paste extracts and different diluted extracts (1/2.5, 1/5) of coarse-textured soils / D. Bakhti, M. Oustani, M. T. Halilat [et al.] // Journal of agriculture and applied biology. – 2024. – Vol. 5, N 1. – P. 18–34. – DOI: 10.11594/jaab.05.01.02.

Березин, Л. В. Лесное почвоведение / Л. В. Березин, Л. О. Карпачевский. – Омск : Омский гос. аграрный ун-т, 2009. – 360 c.

Карпачевский, Л. О. Курс лесного почвоведения / Л. О. Карпачевский, Ю. Н. Ашинов, Л. В. Березин. – Майкоп : Фякс, 2009. – 345 с.

Ремезов, Н. П. Лесное почвоведение / Н. П. Ремезов, П. С. Погребняк. – Москва : Лесная пром-сть, 1965. – 324 с.

Погребняк, П. С. Основы лесной типологии / П. С. Погребняк. – Киев : Изд-во Акад. наук УкрССР, 1953. – 455 с.

 

REFERENCES

Pozdniakov AI, Pozdniakova AD. Electrophysics of soils. Moskva-Dmitrov, RF: Izd-vo Moskovskogo gos un-ta; 2004. 48 s. (In Russ.)

Pozdniakov AI, Giulalyev ChG.  Electrophysical properties of some soils. Moskva-Baku, RF, Azerbaidzhan: Adil'ogly; 2004. 240 s. (In Russ.)

Pozdniakov AI, Kovalev NG, Pozdniakova AD. Field electrophysics in soil science, melioration and agriculture. Tver', RF: ChuDo; 2002. 257 s. (In Russ.)

Vadiunina AF, Korchagina ZA. Methods of studying the physical properties of soils. 3-e izd, pererab i dop. Moskva, RF: Agropromizdat; 1986. 416 s. (In Russ.)

Gholizadeh A, Amin MSM, Anuar AR, Wayayok A. Relationship between apparent electrical conductivity and soil physical properties in a Malaysian paddy field. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2012;58(2):155–68. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2010.509132

Corwin DL, Lesch SM. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: Part II. Case study. Comput Electron Agric. 2005;46(1-3):135–52. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.003

Lund ED, Christy CD, Drummond PE. Practical applications of soil electrical conductivity mapping. In: Stafford JV, editor. Precision agriculture. Sheffield, United Kingdom: Sheffield Academic Press; 1999. p. 771–9

Friedman SP. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review. Comput Electron Agric. 2005;46(1-3):45–70. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001

Samouëlian A, Cousin I, Tabbagh A, Bruand A, Richard G. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res. 2005;83(2):173–93. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004

Reynolds JM. An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. 696 p

Loiseau B, Carrière SD, Jougnot D, Singha K, Mary B, Delpierre N, et al. The geophysical toolbox applied to forest ecosystems–A review. Sci Total Environ. 2023;899:165503. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165503

Allred BJ, Daniels JJ, Ehsani MR, editors. Handbook of agricultural geophysics. Boca Raton, USA: Taylor & Francis Group; 2008. 410 p

Szalai S, Szarka L. On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays. Geophys Prospect. 2008;56(2):159–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00673.x

Seidel K, Lange G. Direct current resistivity methods. In: Environmental geology: Handbook of field methods and case studies. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007. p. 205–237

COMSOL Multiphysics : Reference Manual. Burlington, USA: COMSOL Inc; 2024. URL: COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual 6.2 (date of access: 24.08.2025)

Lee HH. Finite element simulations with ANSYS workbench 2019. Tainan, Taiwan: SDC publications; 2019. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=QPqcDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&dq=Ansys+Meshing+User%27s+Guide&ots=5T3OjjZlyH&sig=dvo8yVIOHuDB_jKXOSSmn_HnNMg (date of access: 24.05.2025)

Adler A, Lionheart WRB. EIDORS: An open-source software for electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas. 2006;27(5):S25–S42. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/S03

Griffiths DH, Barker RD. Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophy. 1993;29(3-4):211–26. doi: 10.1016/0926-9851(93)90005-J

Wenner F. A method of measuring earth resistivity. Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. Washington, USA: Government Printing Office; 1916. Vol. 12. p. 469–78

Kekane SS, Chavan RP, Shinde DN, Patil CL, Sagar SS. A review on physico-chemical properties of soil. Int J Chem Stud. 2015;3(4):29–32

Corwin DL, Lesch SM. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput Electron Agric. 2005;46(1-3):11–43. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005

Kulmány IM, Bede L, Stencinger D, Zsebo S, Csavajda P, Kalocsai R, et al. Challenges in mapping soil variability using apparent soil electrical conductivity under heterogeneous topographic conditions. Agronomy (Basel). 2024;14(6):1–16. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14061161

Corwin DL, Plant RE. Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric. 2005;46(1-3):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.004

McNeill JD. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers: Technical Note TN-6. Mississauga, Canada: Geonics Limited; 1980. 15 p

Sheets KR, Hendrickx JMH. Noninvasive soil water content measurement using electromagnetic induction. Water Resour Res. 1995;31(10):2401–9. doi: 10.1029/95WR01949

Topp GC, Davis JL. Measurement of soil water content using time-domain reflectrometry (TDR): a field evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1985;49(1):19–24. doi: 10.2136/SSSAJ1985.03615995004900010003X

Rhoades JD, Manteghi NA, Shouse PJ, Alves WJ. Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: New formulations and calibrations. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1989;53:433–9

Corwin DL, Scudiero E. Field-scale apparent soil electrical conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2020;84(5):1405–41. doi: 10.1002/saj2.20153

Corwin DL, Rhoades JD. An improved method for estimating soil salinity from soil electrical conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1982;46(6):1217–21

Corwin DL, Lesch SM. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron J. 2003;95(3):455–71

Ayars JE, Corwin DL. Salinity management. In: Ayars E, Zaccaria D, Bali KM, editors. Microirrigation for Crop Production. 2nd ed. [place unknown]: Elsevier Science; 2024. p. 133–55

Rhoades JD. Electrical conductivity methods for measuring and mapping soil salinity. Advances in Agronomy. 1993;49:201–51. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60795-6

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 1. Device and laboratory technique. Vestnik farmatsii. 2021;(3):32–40. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.3.32. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 2. The design of the electrodes and the method of calculating the geometric coefficient. Vestnik farmatsii. 2021;(4):46–52. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.4.46. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 3. Correction of humidity influence. Vestnik farmatsii. 2021;(4):74–84. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2021.4.74. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 4. Soil matrix. Vestnik farmatsii. 2022;(1):56–62. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.1.56. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 5. Field trials. Vestnik farmatsii. 2022;(2):65–76. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.2.65. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 6. Square installation, electrode design and method of calculating the geometric coefficient. Vestnik farmatsii. 2022;(3):23–9. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2022.3.23. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 7. New in measurement and calculation techniques. Vestnik farmatsii. 2024;(2):31–41. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2024.2.31. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 8. Field tests with a square installation. Vestnik farmatsii. 2024;(4):44–54. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2024.4.44. (In Russ.)

Buzuk GN. Determination of soil trophicity by electrophysical method. Message 9. From linearization to exponential regression and moisture correction. Vestnik farmatsii. 2025;(1):58–69. doi: 10.52540/2074-9457.2025.1.58. (In Russ.)

Habberjam GM, Watkins GE. The use of a square configuration in resistivity prospecting. Geophys Prospect. 1967;15(3):445–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1967.tb01798.x

Habberjam GM. The effects of anisotropy on square array resistivity measurements. Geophys Prospect. 1972;20(2):249–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00631.x

Wu YC, Koch WF, Pratt KW. Proposed new electrolytic conductivity primary standards for KCl solutions. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1991;96(2):191–201. doi: 10.6028/jres.096.008

Seo BS, Lee KS, Leong YJ, Choi WJ. Effects of equilibrium time on electrical conductivity measurements using soil-water extracts and soil saturated paste. Korean j of soil science and fertilizer. 2021;54(2):257–63. doi: 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.2.257

Aboukila E, Abdelaty EF. Assessment of saturated soil paste salinity from 1:2.5 and 1:5 soil-water extracts for coarse textured soils. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 2017;38(4):722–32. doi: 10.21608/ASEJAIQJSAE.2017.4181

Aboukila EF, Norton JB. Estimation of saturated soil paste salinity from soil-water extracts. Soil Sci. 2017;182(3):107–13. doi: 10.1097/SS.0000000000000197

He Y, DeSutter T, Prunty L, Hopkins D, Jia X, Wysocki DA. Evaluation of 1:5 soil to water extract electrical conductivity methods. Geoderma. 2012;185:12–7. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.022

Kargas G, Londra P, Sgoubopoulou A. Comparison of soil EC values from methods based on 1:1 and 1:5 soils to water ratios and ECe from saturated paste extract-based method. Water (Basel). 2020;12(4):1–12. doi: 10.3390/w12041010

Kargas G, Londra P, Sotirakoglou K. The effect of soil texture on the conversion factor of 1:5 soil/water extract electrical conductivity (EC 1:5) to soil saturated paste extract electrical conductivity (ECe). Water (Basel). 2022;14(4):1–10. doi: 10.3390/w14040642

Kargas G, Chatzigiakoumis I, Kollias A, Spiliotis D, Kerkides P. An Investigation of the relationship between the electrical conductivity of the soil saturated paste extract ECe with the respective values of the mass soil/water ratios 1:1 and 1:5 (EC1:1 and EC1:5). Proceedings (MDPI). 2018;2(11):1–8. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2110661

Hassannia M, Nazari B, Kavani A, Sotoodehnia A. Evaluation and analysis of different regression models for estimation of ECe from EC1:5–With a case study from Buin-Zahra, Iran. Irrigation and Drainage. 2020;69(5):1192–203. doi: 10.1002/ird.2488

Omar MM, Shitindi M, Massawe BHJ, Pedersen O, Meliyo Jl, Fue K. Modeling the electrical conductivity relationship between saturated paste extract and 1:2.5 dilution in different soil textural classes. Front Soil Sci. 2024;4:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2024.1421661

Spiteri K, Sacco AT. Estimating the electrical conductivity of a saturated soil paste extract (ECe) from 1:1 (EC1:1), 1:2 (EC1:2) and 1:5 (EC1:5) soil: water suspension ratios, in calcareous soils from the Mediterranean Islands of Malta. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2024;55(9):1302–12. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2024.2304636

Bakhti D, Oustani M, Halilat MT, Zemour H, Khadoumi A, Belhouadjeb FA. Correlation between electrical conductivity in saturated paste extracts and different diluted extracts (1/2.5, 1/5) of coarse-textured soils. J of Agriculture and Applied Biology. 2024;5(1):18–34. doi: 10.11594/jaab.05.01.02

Berezin LV, Karpachevskii LO. Forest soil science. Omsk, RF: Omskii gos agrarnyi un-t; 2009. 360 s. (In Russ.)

Karpachevskii LO, Ashnov IuN, Berezin LV. Forest Soil Science Course. Maikop, RF: Aiaks; 2009. 345 s. (In Russ.)

Remezov NP, Pogrebniak PS. Forest soil science. Moskva, RF: Lesnaia prom-st'; 1965. 324 s. (In Russ.)

Pogrebniak PS. Fundamentals of forest typology. Kiev, Ukraine: Izd-vo Akad nauk UkrSSR; 1953. 455 s. (In Russ.)

 

Адрес для корреспонденции:

г. Витебск, Республика Беларусь,

тел. +375-29-715-08-38,

e-mail: Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.,

профессор, доктор фармацевтических наук,

Бузук Г. Н.

Поступила 06.06.2025 г.